Compare · Automation
More bots, or a redesigned process?
Keep the bots that work. Redesign the flow they were patching.
Got a bottleneck that costs you $1M or more, and you want it solved?
Bot: clicks through screens
Redesign: owned steps across systems
- ERP
- Portal
- Approval
RPA, or redesign?
Four signs each way.
RPA is still right when
- The screens rarely change
- There is no API to use
- Every step is deterministic
- Exceptions are rare
Redesign when
- Inputs are unstructured: emails, PDFs, scans
- Bots break whenever a screen changes
- Exceptions keep growing
- Nobody owns the whole path
Who does what.
Bots copy keystrokes. A redesign gives each kind of work its own lane.
| Lane | Bot estate today | Redesigned flow |
|---|---|---|
| Rules | Hard-coded in screen scripts | Explicit checks in the process, versioned |
| AI | Often none | Reads emails, PDFs and claims; flags doubt |
| People | Fix what the bot dropped | Decide the exceptions, with the evidence |
Migration without a big bang.
Bots retire one at a time, as the flow takes over their work.
- Keep the stable bots
- Redesign the flow around exceptions
- Move work lane by lane
- Retire each bot when its work has moved
For corporates and large organizations
$1M+
We solve process bottlenecks worth $1M or more. Not for small businesses.
Stop after any stage. Scope and investment come from a costed statement of work.
Security & data
- Permissions and data boundaries designed in diagnosis, tested before production.
- Access, data boundaries and retention agreed in writing per engagement.
Bring the bot that breaks most.
30 minutes with our team.
Book a 30-minute call
Not the budget holder? Forward this page